GUIDE • DIVORCE FINANCE SOLICITORS
Hidden assets
A fair financial settlement depends on both spouses being honest about what they own and earn. Most people comply with their duty of disclosure, but where one spouse controls the family finances, runs a business or has assets abroad, there can be real concern that not everything is being revealed. The family court has wide powers to investigate, preserve assets and penalise concealment. This guide explains the warning signs, the tools available, and what to avoid.
Written by Nicola Jones - Partner, Divorce and Family - Last reviewed 13th October 2026
KEY POINTS
- Both spouses have a legal duty to give full and frank disclosure of their finances.
- The court can order further disclosure, including directly from banks, employers and other third parties.
- Where assets are at risk of being moved, the court can freeze them or reverse transactions already made.
- If a spouse is found to have hidden assets, the court can assume they have more than they admit.
- A settlement based on concealed assets can be set aside, even years later.
What are the signs that assets may be hidden?
There is rarely a single clear indicator, but common warning signs include:
- unexplained transfers to family members, friends or new partners;
- a sudden drop in business profits or income around the time of separation;
- a lifestyle that does not match the income or assets disclosed;
- accounts, investments or properties abroad that have not been mentioned;
- large cash withdrawals or new holdings in cryptocurrency; and
- reluctance to provide documents or delays in completing disclosure.
How can hidden assets be uncovered?
The starting point is careful scrutiny of the other spouse's Form E and supporting documents, particularly bank statements, which often reveal unexplained payments or accounts. Your solicitor can then raise targeted questions through a questionnaire, which the court can order to be answered. Where information is still missing, the court can order documents to be produced by third parties, such as banks, accountants or employers. In more complex cases, a forensic accountant can be instructed to trace funds or analyse business accounts for signs of manipulation, such as deferred income or inflated expenses.
Can the court stop my spouse moving assets?
Yes. Under section 37 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, the court can grant a freezing injunction preventing a spouse from dealing with assets where it is satisfied they intend to defeat a financial claim. It can also set aside transactions that have already happened, such as a transfer to a relative, unless the recipient paid full value in good faith. If the transaction took place less than three years before the application, the court will presume it was made with the intention of defeating the claim, unless the spouse can show otherwise. Applications can be made urgently, and in some cases without notice to the other spouse.
If you're concerned your spouse may be hiding or moving assets, click below to speak to one of our family solicitors in confidence.
What happens if the court finds assets have been hidden?
The court will not allow a spouse to benefit from concealment. Where it finds that a spouse has not given full disclosure, it can draw adverse inferences, meaning it may conclude that they have more resources than they have admitted and make its order on that basis. It can also make costs orders against them, and in serious cases, giving false information in a sworn financial statement can amount to contempt of court.
What if hidden assets come to light after the settlement?
A settlement is only as reliable as the disclosure it is based on. In 2015, in the joint cases of Sharland v Sharland and Gohil v Gohil, the Supreme Court confirmed that where a financial order was obtained through fraudulent non-disclosure, it will usually be set aside, unless the court is satisfied the outcome would have been the same. If you discover after your settlement that assets were concealed, take advice promptly, as delay can affect your position.
What should I avoid doing myself?
It is natural to want to find evidence yourself, but accessing your spouse's private emails, phone, online accounts or confidential documents without permission is not permitted. Following Imerman v Tchenguiz [2010], documents obtained in this way must be returned, and doing so may expose you to civil claims or criminal liability. You may, however, keep a note of information you already know, and share it with your solicitor, who can use the court's powers to obtain the evidence properly.
Common questions
Usually not, because the divorce itself is dealt with on paper and most financial and children matters are settled without a contested hearing. Mediation, collaborative law, arbitration and solicitor negotiation can all help you reach an agreement without going to court.
You can apply for the conditional order after a minimum of 20 weeks, and then for the final order six weeks and a day after that, so around seven months at the earliest. It often takes longer, especially if you wait for finances to be agreed before applying for the final order.
IN THIS GUIDE
What are the signs that assets may be hidden?
How can hidden assets be uncovered?
Can the court stop my spouse moving assets?
What happens if the court finds assets have been hidden?
What if hidden assets come to light after the settlement?
PART OF OUR SERVICE
Divorce Finance Solicitors
Expert advice on dividing your finances fairly when your marriage ends.
RELATED SERVICES
Enforcing, changing and challenging child arrangement orders
How we work
An experienced family solicitor will run your matter from the first meeting onwards, and you will deal with them directly rather than being passed between members of a team.
Part of their job is to help you decide where your time and money are best spent. In most divorces there are points worth pressing and points that make little difference to the end result, and we will be straightforward with you about which is which.
A lot of matters are resolved through negotiation or mediation, and where that is realistic we will recommend it. Where it is not, because the other side will not engage, or disclosure is incomplete, or the issues are genuinely contested, we will advise you on taking the matter to court and act for you there.
Rushton Family Law is the sister brand of Vardags. If your case involves complex finances or international issues, we will introduce you to the Vardags team.